Skip to main content

Michigan Enterprise Strategic Assessments


Today I visited the EA team at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor.   One of the things they showed me was their template for IT services to document their strategic plans.  These are called MESAs, which stands for Michigan Enterprise Strategic Assessment.  The name was adopted to fit the shape of the headline diagram in the template, which looks like this example:


Components of the service are placed along the curve to reflect their position in the life-cycle at UMich.  As the deployment of a technology or other service component becomes more mature, it moves along the curve from left to right.  The vertical axis shows when the component is in wide use.  The curve is the same for all services – it is like the Gartner hype curve rather than a graph of specific values.  The icon for each component shows whether a component is recommended or deprecated, with more recent versions of the chart also including an icon for components which are being evaluated.

As with Core Diagrams, and several other EA techniques, the value of the technique lies as much in the conversation as in the final deliverable.  It provides a focus for service groups to reflect on the strategy for their service.  The diagram also provides an easy way for other people to see the maturity of each service. 

The full MESA report for a service includes a second chart for a 3-year lookahead, a one-page summary of the strategy, and one page describing each service component, including why the component has been assigned the status shown on the chart.  The report may also include a TIME diagram.  The full report for the example shown above can be seen at bit.ly/1RFlQWD .

UMich have a wiki page that shows all the 39 MESA charts they have developed so far.  These cover about half of the 37 services in their service catalogue.  Some services have found the technique so useful that they have produced multiple charts for different aspects of the service.  The central wiki page gives a quick overview of the strategic plans for each service.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Webinar: Powering your business with Cloud Computing

On October 14th, I will be hosting a Grid Computing Now! web seminar on the topic of Cloud Computing. We have lined up two very interesting speakers who are using Cloud now to make businesses work. Ross Cooney had a good technological solution to sell but couldn't make it economic until Cloud Computing allowed him to pay for his computation only when he needed it. He will discuss the instant benefits and long term impact of cloud computing to the development, competitiveness and scalability of your application. Alan Williamson created the BlueDragon Java CFML runtime engine that powers MySpace.com. He advises several businesses and will give an overview of the different types of services available and how to avoid being locked-in to a single supplier. You can register for this event here .
Post a Comment
Read more

Business Model Canvas

A Business Model Canvas is a tool for mapping the core functions and capabilities of an organisation.  Compared to the Core Diagrams that I described in an earlier post , the business model canvas attempts to present more aspects of the business, starting with the value proposition – a statement of what the organisation offers to its users (in the business world, to its customers).  It shows the activities and resources, as Core Diagrams do, but also shows user relationships & channels, and also benefits and costs.  I’m not aware of any universities that have used this tool but you can find examples from elsewhere on the web. We are considering business model canvases as a tool for mapping the strategic capabilities of units at the University of Edinburgh.  Phil Taylor, our EA contractor, sketched an outline of what a business model canvas might begin to look like for HR: This is only intended to be suggestive: the real canvas would need to result from in-de...
2 comments
Read more

Changing Principles

In EA, architecture principles set a framework for making architectural decisions.  They help to establish a common understanding across different groups of stakeholders, and provide guidance for portfolios and projects.  Michael Durso of the LSE gave a good introduction to the idea in a webinar last week for the UCISA EA community. Many organisations take the TOGAF architecture principles as a starting point.  These are based on the four architectural domains of TOGAF: business, information/data, applications, technology/infrastructure.  These principles tend to describe what should be done, e.g. re-use applications, buy in software rather than build it, keep data secure.  See for example the principles adopted at Plymouth University and the University of Birmingham . Recently though, I encountered a different way of looking at principles.  The user experience design community tend to focus more on how we should do things.  E.g. we should...
1 comment
Read more