Skip to main content

Service Management and Enterprise Architecture



We are currently reviewing our catalogue of IT & Library services.  In this, we follow ITIL, the widely used framework for service management.  This has stimulated some discussion about how enterprise architecture can support service management, and also how the two approaches fit together.

In my opinion, EA best supports service management by providing context and describing how the various services inter-relate.  An ITIL service catalogue is simply a list of services (in much the same way that an EA interface catalogue is just a list of APIs).  The catalogue does not show how the services fit together, or which business capabilities they support, or which group of users uses each service.  ITIL classifies services along one axis as “business services” or “IT services”, and along another axis as “customer-facing services” or “supporting services”, but these are broad-brush terms and open to interpretation.


An architecture diagram can show, for example, that one IT service is “customer-facing” from the point of view of the IT department because it supports “customers” in the Finance department, and that from the Finance department’s point of view the same service is a supporting service that underpins some aspects of one or more of their business services. The notion of “customer” changes depends on who is looking (in architecture, this is called the “viewpoint”).  To continue the example, the finance services may have different customers – one may help students manage their accounts, while another may be for school administrators to manage their internal budgets.

The picture is a conjecture of how we could model this interrelationship for a subset of services.  It shows, in the lower layer, two services provided by a production management group.  These keep the IT applications running.  One thing to note is that individual applications are not services; they only become services when grouped and managed.

The upper layer shows two groups that use these IT services to provide services to various groups of users.  At Edinburgh, the Digital Learning section is part of Information Systems, as is Production Management, while the Finance section is in a different support group.  EA shows that we can use the same model for internal and external customers, and provides a level of clarity that a simple catalogue cannot achieve.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Changing Principles

In EA, architecture principles set a framework for making architectural decisions.  They help to establish a common understanding across different groups of stakeholders, and provide guidance for portfolios and projects.  Michael Durso of the LSE gave a good introduction to the idea in a webinar last week for the UCISA EA community.

Many organisations take the TOGAF architecture principles as a starting point.  These are based on the four architectural domains of TOGAF: business, information/data, applications, technology/infrastructure.  These principles tend to describe what should be done, e.g. re-use applications, buy in software rather than build it, keep data secure.  See for example the principles adopted at Plymouth University and the University of Birmingham.

Recently though, I encountered a different way of looking at principles.  The user experience design community tend to focus more on how we should do things.  E.g. we should start with user needs, use iterative developm…

Why the UCISA Capability Model is useful

What do Universities do?

This may seem a strange question to ask and the answer may seem obvious.  Universities educate students and undertake research.  And perhaps they work with industrial partners and create spin-off companies of their worn.  And they may work with local communities, and affiliation bodies for certain degress, and they definitely report on their activities to government bodies such as HEFCE.  They provide student services and support.  The longeryou think about it, the more things you can think of that a University does.

In business, the things that an organisation does are called "capabilities", which is a slightly strange term.  I think it is linked to the HR idea of a combination of the CAPacity and ABILITY to do a task.  Whatever the name, it is a useful concept.  A capability is more basic than a process: a University may change the way it educates students but as long as it remains a University it will educate them one way or another.

A capability …

A brief summary of our major initiatives

I notice that in 2016 I wrote 34 posts on this blog.  This is only my fifth post in 2017 and we're already three-quarters of the way through the year.  Either I've suddenly got lazier, or else I've had less time to spend writing here.  As I'm not inclined to think of myself as especially lazy, I'm plumping for the latter explanation.

There really is a lot going on.  The University has several major initiatives under way, many of which need input from the Enterprise Architecture section.

The Service Excellence programme is overhauling (the buzzword is "transforming") our administrative processes for HR, Finance, and Student Administration.  Linked to this is a programme to procure an integrated ERP system to replace the adminstrative IT systems. 

Enabling Digital Transformation is a programme to put the middleware and architecture in place so that we can make our processes "digital first".  We're implementing an API framework, a notification…