Skip to main content

Land speed record and inspiration and informal education

The conference was closed by a talk from Richard Noble about the challenge of breaking the land speed record, first with ThrustSSC, the first car to break the sound barrier, and now with BloodhoundSSC, which is planned to be the first car to travel at 1000mph.  This was a story of derring-do and engineering.
 
One less obvious aspect of the BloodhoundSSC story is the education project built around it.  The UK doesn’t produce enough engineers and is the worst country in Europe for the gender balance in engineering: only 10% of professional engineers are women.    In 50% of all state co-ed schools not a single girl is taking Physics A-level.  Richard attributes this in part to the lack of projects to generate excitement in children.  In the 1950’s and 1960’s kids would see Avro Vulcans, English Electric Lightnings and Concorde flying overhead and some of those kids would be excited by them.  Americans had the space race.  (Later on, of course, British kids had Spectrums and BBC Micros and learnt all about computers).
 
Richard sees the BloodhoundSSC as an adventure which can generate enthusiasm among schoolkids.  The education project has team of 20 people and has reached 5,400 schools throughout the UK and more schools overseas, including the remote desert area of South Africa where the test track is being built. 

Another interesting aspect of Richard’s story is the role of the web vs conventional mass media.  During the ThrustSSC project he tried to engage conventional broadcasters in producing TV programmes about the design and the challenges.  None of them were interested.  His contact at the BBC told him that the public weren’t interested in technology.  Then he was approached by a web design company.  This was in 1992 and he hadn’t even heard of the web but he saw an opportunity.  By 1997 this was the 5th most popular web site in the world and people were reading the technical specs as well as the promotional material.

This story is repeating itself.  The BloodhoundSSC project has been approached by many TV companies but none of them have wanted to include any technical material so the project has turned them all down. 

This was a fun presentation and parts of it were inspiring. Richard didn’t directly address any issues that might affect us in our own work.  He stressed that the teamwork was vital but didn’t give any suggestions for how to make a team work, although he exemplified several aspects of leadership – he obviously has a clear vision, tremendous enthusiasm, dogged persistence in the face of setbacks and good communication skills.  He could do with a bit of work on his timekeeping – the hour-long presentation overran by almost half an hour and I had to miss the last ten minutes.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Changing Principles

In EA, architecture principles set a framework for making architectural decisions.  They help to establish a common understanding across different groups of stakeholders, and provide guidance for portfolios and projects.  Michael Durso of the LSE gave a good introduction to the idea in a webinar last week for the UCISA EA community.

Many organisations take the TOGAF architecture principles as a starting point.  These are based on the four architectural domains of TOGAF: business, information/data, applications, technology/infrastructure.  These principles tend to describe what should be done, e.g. re-use applications, buy in software rather than build it, keep data secure.  See for example the principles adopted at Plymouth University and the University of Birmingham.

Recently though, I encountered a different way of looking at principles.  The user experience design community tend to focus more on how we should do things.  E.g. we should start with user needs, use iterative developm…

Why the UCISA Capability Model is useful

What do Universities do?

This may seem a strange question to ask and the answer may seem obvious.  Universities educate students and undertake research.  And perhaps they work with industrial partners and create spin-off companies of their worn.  And they may work with local communities, and affiliation bodies for certain degress, and they definitely report on their activities to government bodies such as HEFCE.  They provide student services and support.  The longeryou think about it, the more things you can think of that a University does.

In business, the things that an organisation does are called "capabilities", which is a slightly strange term.  I think it is linked to the HR idea of a combination of the CAPacity and ABILITY to do a task.  Whatever the name, it is a useful concept.  A capability is more basic than a process: a University may change the way it educates students but as long as it remains a University it will educate them one way or another.

A capability …

"No more us & them"

WonkHE recently posted an interesting opinion piece with the title Academics and Administrators: No more ‘us and them’. In that post, Paul Greatrix rebutted criticisms of professional services (administrative) staff in Universites from some academics. To illustrate his point, he quoted recent articles in which administrators were portrayed as a useless overhead on the key tasks at hand (teaching and research).

This flows both ways, as Greatrix himself points out. As Enterprise Architect, I work with Professional Services colleagues and I have heard some of them express opinions that clearly fail to understand the nature of academic work. Academics cannot be treated as if they were factory workers, churning out lectures on a treadmill.

I think these comments reveal a fundamental clash of ideas about how a University should work. Some people who come into management positions for other sectors tend to frame the University as a business, with students and research funders as customers t…